Non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: 10-year retrospective analysis in Seattle, Washington.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25140868.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0105030 and PMC identifier 4139302.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Despite treatment guidelines in place since 2005, non-occupational post-exposure HIV prophylaxis (nPEP) remains an underutilized prevention strategy. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a publicly-funded HIV clinic in Seattle, Washington for nPEP between 2000 and 2010 (N = 360). nPEP prescriptions were provided for 324 (90%) patients; 83% of prescription decisions were appropriate according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, but only 31% (N = 111/360) of patients were considered "high risk." In order to use limited resources most efficiently, public health agencies should target messaging for this high-cost intervention to individuals with high-risk HIV exposures.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-HIV Agents
- HIV Infections
- Post-Exposure Prophylaxis