Measured resection versus gap balancing technique for femoral rotational alignment: a prospective study.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25163946.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the measured resection technique and the gap balancing technique for correction of the femoral rotational alignment. 57 women and 6 men (mean age, 70 years) with end-stage osteoarthritis and <15º malalignment and <10º flexion contracture of the knee underwent primary total knee arthroplasty through the medial approach using the measured resection technique (n=34) or the gap balancing technique (n=29). Femoral rotational alignment was evaluated before and 7 days after surgery using computed tomography by referencing the 2 posterior condyles to the transepicondylar axis. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in terms of correction of the femoral rotational alignment (3.4º ± 1.4º vs. 3.5º ± 3.1º, p=0.817). The measured resection and the gap balancing techniques achieved comparable correction of femoral rotational alignment.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Bone Malalignment
- Knee Prosthesis
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
Anatomy
- femur
- knee
- tibia