A literature review and case series of accelerating fracture healing in postmenopausal osteoporotic working women.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25264411.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jor.2014.06.018 and PMC identifier 4174256.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Majority of fractures do not cause significant long-term morbidity and mortality. A 10% of these fractures result in impaired fracture healing, drastically affecting quality of life in affected patients. Satisfactory healing of these osteoporotic fractures are critically important to functional recovery, morbidity, and quality of life. Some therapies for osteoporosis may affect the processes associated with bone repair. For example, bisphosphonates in experimental models are associated with increased callus size and mineralization, reduced callus remodeling, and improved mechanical strength. Local and systemic bisphosphonate treatment may improve implant fixation. No negative impact on fracture healing has been observed, even after major surgery or when administered immediately after fracture. For the osteoanabolic agent teriparatide, case reports and a randomized trial have produced mixed results, but they are consistent with a positive impact of teriparatide on fracture healing. At this point, therefore, there is no evidence that osteoporosis therapies are detrimental to fracture healing with some promising experimental evidence for positive effects on healing, notably for those agents whose actions are primarily anabolic.