Longitudinal associations between self-rated health and performance-based physical function in a population-based cohort of older adults.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25365288.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0111761 and PMC identifier 4218810.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although self-rated health (SRH) and performance-based physical function (PPF) are both strong predictors of mortality, little research has investigated the relationships between them. The objective of this study was to evaluate longitudinal, bi-directional associations between SRH and PPF. METHODS: We evaluated longitudinal associations between SRH and PPF in 3,610 adults aged 65-89 followed for an average of 4.8 (standard deviation [SD]: 4.4) years between 1994 and July 2011 in the Adult Changes in Thought study, a population-based cohort in the Seattle area. SRH was assessed with a single-item question in the ACT study. Participants were asked at each evaluation to rate their health as "excellent", "very good", "good", "fair", or "poor" in response to the question "In general, how would you rate your health at this time". PPF scores (ranging from 0-16, with higher indicating better performance) included walking speed, chair rises, grip strength, and balance. RESULTS: At the baseline visit, participants averaged 74.5 (SD: 5.8) years of age and 2,115 (58.6%) were female. In multivariable linear mixed models, PPF declined with age, with more rapid decreases associated with very good, good, and fair (vs. excellent) baseline SRH. Adjusted annual change in PPF was -0.17 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.19, -0.15) for individuals with excellent baseline SRH and -0.21 points (95% CI: -0.22, -0.19) for participants with fair SRH. In multivariable generalized linear mixed models, lower baseline PPF quartiles were associated with lower odds of excellent/very good/good SRH at age 75, however, differences between baseline PPF quartiles diminished with age. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that less than excellent SRH predicts decline in physical functioning, however, poor physical functioning may not predict change in SRH in a reciprocal fashion. SRH provides a simple assessment tool for identifying individuals at increased risk for decline in physical function.
Medical subject headings
- Aging
- Health Status
- Physical Fitness
- Self-Assessment