The use of sling vs sphincter in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25382641.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/bju.12976.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is considered the 'gold standard' in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. However, in recent years, male slings have gained much popularity due to the ease of surgery, good functional results and low complications rates. This review systematically shows the evidence for the different sling systems, describes the working mechanism, and compares their efficacy against that of the AUS. Furthermore subgroups of patients are defined who are not suited to undergo sling surgery.
Medical subject headings
- Prostatectomy
- Suburethral Slings
- Urinary Incontinence
- Urinary Sphincter, Artificial