Consumers believe nutrition facts labeling for added sugar will be more helpful than confusing.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25401931.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/oby.20887.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Consumer beliefs regarding the usefulness of information about added sugars proposed for addition to the Nutrition Facts panel on U.S. food labeling were assessed. A representative sample of 500 U.S. adults was recruited in July 2014 for an anonymous, voluntary online survey. Respondents were shown a Nutrition Facts panel with added sugars included and were asked how helpful or confusing the added sugars information would be and why. A 5-point scale captured responses about helpfulness, and reasons were captured as free text. Descriptive statistics were calculated and multi-linear regression performed to determine whether any demographic variables were statistically significant predictors of survey responses. A clear majority (63%) of respondents indicated that knowing the amount of added sugar in a food product would be helpful. Relatively few (18%) thought it would be confusing. None of the demographic variables were statistically significant, with the exception of gender. Being female was a statistically significant predictor of how helpful the information was perceived to be (P < 0.03). Most consumers believed food labeling for added sugars will be more helpful than confusing.
Medical subject headings
- Adult
- Confusion
- Consumer Behavior
- Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data
- Culture
- Data Collection
- Dietary Carbohydrates
- Dietary Carbohydrates/standards
- Female
- Food Labeling
- Food Labeling/trends
- Humans
- Linear Models
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Nutrition Policy
- Nutrition Policy/trends
- Online Systems
- Sex Factors
- United States