Validation of a chicken wing training model for endoscopic microsurgical dissection.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25417605.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/lary.24977.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine if training with a chicken wing model improves performance of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) with microvascular dissection. Randomized experimental study. A single-blinded randomized clinical trial of trainees with various levels of endoscopic experience was conducted to determine if prior training on a nonhuman model augments endoscopic skill and efficiency in a surrogate model for live surgery. Medical students, residents, and fellows were randomized to two groups: a control group that performed an endoscopic transantral internal maxillary artery dissection on a silicone-injected anatomical specimen, and an interventional group that underwent microvascular dissection training on a chicken wing model prior to performing the anatomic dissection on the cadaver specimen. Time to completion and quality of dissection were measured. A Mann-Whitney test demonstrated a significant improvement in time and quality outcomes respectively across all interventional groups, with the greatest improvements seen in participants with less endoscopic experience: medical students (P = .032, P = .008), residents and fellows (P = .016, P = .032). Prior training on the chicken wing model improves surgical performance in a surrogate model for live EES.
Medical subject headings
- Dissection
- Education, Medical, Graduate
- Endoscopy
- Microsurgery
- Models, Anatomic
- Nose
- Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures