No decreased infection rate when using antibiotic-impregnated cement in primary total joint arthroplasty.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25437076.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3928/01477447-20141124-07.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
There has been much debate and controversy about the routine use of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement in primary total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to undertake a meta-analysis to determine whether the use of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement would reduce the incidence of infection after primary total joint arthroplasty. Of 313 citations identified for screening, 6 trials reporting 26,791 patients were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. The authors found no statistically significant difference between antibiotic-impregnated bone cement and plain bone cement in terms of the incidence of infection. The results indicated that the use of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement in primary total joint arthroplasty did not lead to a decrease in the rate of infection.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Arthroplasty, Replacement
- Bone Cements
- Joint Prosthesis
- Prosthesis-Related Infections