Radiographic comparison of mobile-bearing partial knee single-peg versus twin-peg design.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25453627.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.015.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The femoral component and proprietary instrumentation of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was redesigned with an additional peg for enhanced fixation, 15° of extra femoral surface for contact in deep flexion, more rounded profile, better fit into the milled surface, and redesigned intramedullary based instrumentation. To assess the benefit of these changes, we compared postoperative radiographs of 219 single-peg and 186 twin-peg UKAs done in 2008-2011. All surviving knees demonstrated satisfactory position and alignment with no radiolucencies observed. Radiographic analysis showed improved and consistent component positioning with the twin-peg design implanted with updated instrumentation compared with the single-peg. The radiographic benefits of improved implant positioning using the twin-peg component and updated instrumentation are clear and carry tremendous potential. More robust follow-up is imperative.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Femur
- Knee Joint
- Knee Prosthesis
Anatomy
- femur
- knee