Planned Bone Resections Using an MRI-Based Custom Cutting Guide System Versus 3-Dimensional, Weight-Bearing Images in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25533640.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.009.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Potential sources of alignment variability not yet investigated with the use of custom cutting guides (CCG) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are weight-bearing and lower extremity rotation. This study compared the preoperative planned bone resections created using an MRI-based CCG system to those from 3-dimensional, weight-bearing, full-length lower extremity images in 53 patients undergoing TKA. The angular difference between the proposed resections of the two systems was greater than 2° in 30.2% of patients for the distal femur, and 52.8% for the proximal tibia. An increased preoperative varus alignment had a slight association with an increased angular difference for the tibial resection (r=0.4). This study demonstrates weight-bearing and lower extremity rotation to be potential sources of alignment variability when using MRI-based CCGs.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Femur
- Tibia
- Weight-Bearing
Anatomy
- femur
- knee
- tibia