Cost-effective prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total joint arthroplasty: warfarin versus aspirin.
other · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25534862.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.08.018.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Although recent guidelines suggest aspirin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in low risk patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there are no cost-effectiveness studies comparing aspirin and warfarin. In a Markov cohort cost-effectiveness analysis, we found that aspirin cost less and saved more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than warfarin in all age groups. Cost per QALY gained by aspirin was $24,506.20 at age of 55 and $47,148.10 at the age of 85 following THA and $15,117.20 and $24,458.10 after TKA, which were greater than warfarin. In patients undergoing THA/TKA without prior VTE, aspirin is more cost-effective prophylactic agent than warfarin. Warfarin might be a better prophylaxis in TKA patients with high probability of VTE and very low probability of bleeding.
Medical subject headings
- Anticoagulants
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Aspirin
- Venous Thromboembolism
- Warfarin
Anatomy
- hip
- knee