Revisiting the argument for 1- versus 2-vein outflow in head and neck free tissue transfers: A review of 317 microvascular reconstructions.

Silverman, Dustin A; Przylecki, Wojciech H; Arganbright, Jill M; Shnayder, Yelizaveta; Kakarala, Kiran; Nazir, Niaman; Tsue, Terance T; Girod, Douglas A et al. · Head Neck · 2016

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the benefit of 1-vein versus 2-vein outflow in microvascular free tissue transfers. A retrospective review reflects the experience of 6 surgeons. Analysis included all patients who underwent reconstruction at a single institution between January 2004 and December 2012. Three hundred nine patients underwent a total of 317 microvascular free flap reconstructions for head and neck defects. Two hundred thirteen of 317 flaps (67.2%) used 1 venous anastomosis and 104 (32.8%) used 2 venous anastomoses. Venous congestion necessitated urgent take back in 37 of 57 patients (64.9%) requiring exploration for perioperative complications. Thirty of 37 flaps (81.1%) with venous congestion had 1 vein anastomosis, whereas 7 (18.9%) had dual vein outflow (p = .03). Overall flap success was 303 of 317 (95.6%), despite an 18.0% (57 of 317) perioperative take back rate. Coapting 2 veins was shown to minimize venous congestion. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 820-823, 2016.

Medical subject headings