Revisiting the argument for 1- versus 2-vein outflow in head and neck free tissue transfers: A review of 317 microvascular reconstructions.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25546076.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.23976.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the benefit of 1-vein versus 2-vein outflow in microvascular free tissue transfers. A retrospective review reflects the experience of 6 surgeons. Analysis included all patients who underwent reconstruction at a single institution between January 2004 and December 2012. Three hundred nine patients underwent a total of 317 microvascular free flap reconstructions for head and neck defects. Two hundred thirteen of 317 flaps (67.2%) used 1 venous anastomosis and 104 (32.8%) used 2 venous anastomoses. Venous congestion necessitated urgent take back in 37 of 57 patients (64.9%) requiring exploration for perioperative complications. Thirty of 37 flaps (81.1%) with venous congestion had 1 vein anastomosis, whereas 7 (18.9%) had dual vein outflow (p = .03). Overall flap success was 303 of 317 (95.6%), despite an 18.0% (57 of 317) perioperative take back rate. Coapting 2 veins was shown to minimize venous congestion. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 820-823, 2016.
Medical subject headings
- Free Tissue Flaps
- Head
- Neck
- Veins