Evaluation of a telephone advice system for remote intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke: data from a United kingdom network.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25604248.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008190.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
There is limited evidence for remote stroke thrombolysis using telephone consultation and teleradiology. Results from a UK network using this treatment model are presented. Retrospective study of consecutive patients thrombolysed in 5 hospitals, with well organized stroke services, between 2012 and 2013. Remote thrombolysis was compared with thrombolysis delivered in person for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, death within 7 days, and 90-day modified Rankin scores. Of 586 patients, 220 (37.5%) were thrombolysed remotely. The 2 groups were well matched (median age 77 years, NIHSS 12). Remote thrombolysis increased treatment time by 22 minutes. Outcomes were no different in the 2 groups (remote versus standard): symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (3.6% versus 4.6%), death within 7 days (6.4% versus 7.1%), modified Rankin score <2 (46.0% versus 46.1%), and modified Rankin score 6 (15% versus 17.5%) at 90 days. Telephone advice and teleradiology, within an organized system of care, can be an effective method of delivery of intravenous thrombolysis.
Medical subject headings
- Brain Ischemia
- Cardiology
- Infusions, Intravenous
- Stroke
- Telemedicine
- Thrombolytic Therapy