Training and standards for performance, interpretation, and structured reporting for supplemental breast cancer screening.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25615748.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2214/AJR.14.13794.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. To compensate for the reduction of mammography's sensitivity in women with dense breasts, supplemental screening can increase the cancer detection rate. The modalities suggested are MRI, which is the most sensitive and is indicated for women with the highest risk of breast cancer, and ultrasound, which is suggested for dense-breasted average-risk women. CONCLUSION. For decades, ultrasound has been a focused examination. Extending a handheld ultrasound examination to depict the entire breast requires formal didactic training and hands-on scanning to learn suitable, efficient methods. Automated options also require intensive training in performance and interpretation.
Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
- Early Detection of Cancer
- Ultrasonography, Mammary