The impact of inter-survey differences in the definition of current smokeless tobacco use on comparability of US national and state-specific prevalence estimates, 2009-2011.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25625692.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.014.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We assessed how varying definitions of adult current smokeless tobacco (SLT) use affected overall prevalence estimates. National prevalence estimates were from five surveys: 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2009-2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey (NATS), 2010-2011 Tobacco Use Supplement of the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS), 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), and 2010 National Health Information Survey (NHIS). State-specific prevalence estimates were from three surveys: 2009-2010 NATS, 2010-2011 TUS-CPS, and 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Current SLT use definitions were as follows: past 5-day use (NHANES), past 30-day use (NATS and NSDUH), and "every day" or "some days" use (TUS-CPS, NHIS, and BRFSS). Inter-survey variations further existed in number and types of SLT products assessed. National prevalence estimates of current SLT use were as follows: NATS (3.9%), NSDUH (3.6%), NHIS (2.8%), NHANES (2.3%), and TUS-CPS (1.6%). State-specific prevalence estimates of SLT use were generally lower for TUS-CPS (median=2.1%, range: 0.5% in California and New York, to 7.2% in Wyoming) compared to either BRFSS (median=4.0%: range: 0.9% in Washington D.C., to 8.2% in Wyoming) or NATS (median=4.7%; range: 1.3% in New Jersey, to 9.8% in Wyoming). Concerted efforts are needed among interagency groups to harmonize SLT definition within different surveys.
Medical subject headings
- Tobacco, Smokeless