Evaluation of gynecologic cancer with MR imaging, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and PET/MR imaging.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25635136.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.114.145011.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
MR imaging and (18)F-FDG PET/CT play central and complementary roles in the care of patients with gynecologic cancer. Because treatment often requires combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, imaging is central to triage and to determining prognosis. This article reviews the use of the 2 imaging modalities in the initial evaluation of 3 common cancers: uterine cervical, uterine endometrial, and epithelial ovarian. Imaging features that affect management are highlighted, as well as the relative strengths and weaknesses of the 2 modalities. Use of imaging after initial therapy to assess for recurrence and to plan salvage therapy is described. Newer functional and molecular techniques in MR imaging and PET are evaluated. Finally, we describe our initial experience with PET/MR imaging, an emerging technology that may prove to be a mainstay in personalized gynecologic cancer care.
Medical subject headings
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Ovarian Neoplasms
- Positron-Emission Tomography
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Uterine Neoplasms