Comparison of European (ESR) and American (ACR) white papers on teleradiology: patient primacy is paramount.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25652303.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.027.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The ACR and European Society of Radiology white papers on teleradiology propose best practice guidelines for teleradiology, with each body focusing on its respective local situation, market, and legal regulations. The organizations have common viewpoints, the most important being patient primacy, maintenance of quality, and the "supplementary" position of teleradiology to local services. The major differences between the white papers are related mainly to the market situation, the use of teleradiology, teleradiologist credentialing and certification, the principles of "international" teleradiology, and the need to obtain "informed consent" from patients. The authors describe these similarities and differences by highlighting the background and context of teleradiology in Europe and the United States.
Medical subject headings
- Informed Consent
- Patient Participation
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Teleradiology