Regulatory enforcement and fiscal impact in local health agencies.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25689178.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302446 and PMC identifier 4355701.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We used a cross-sectional, retrospective study design to analyze the association between local health agency regulatory activities and revenues from nonclinical fees and fines (NFF). We extracted data from the 2010 National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) Profile Survey, the most recent report including NFF information, and used 2-part multivariable regression models to identify relationships between regulatory activities and revenue. We also interviewed LHD directors on access to revenue from fines. NFFs generated substantial revenue for most LHDs, increasing in scope and amount with jurisdiction size for all but the largest municipalities. The greatest proportion of net revenue came from public pools, campgrounds and recreational vehicles, and solid waste disposal. For small and mid-sized LHDs, enforcement activities generated revenue in a dose-response pattern, with higher returns for increased activities. LHDs in decentralized governance states collected more NFF revenue than those in centralized states. States vary regarding LHD access to revenue from sanctions. The fiscal impact of changes in regulatory activity needs careful assessment to avoid unanticipated consequences of applicable law.
Medical subject headings
- Local Government
- Public Health Administration