Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Head and Neck Melanoma has Prognostic Impact on Disease-Free and Overall Survival.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25712801.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-4439-x.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) plays an important role in the prognostic classification of melanoma and is now a standard staging procedure. However, due to the complex drainage pattern and the risk of site associated morbidity, the potential survival benefit of SLNB is controversial in head and neck (H&N) melanoma. Patients with primary H&N melanoma with a tumor thickness ≥1.00 mm diagnosed in the Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Germany between 1991 and 2010 were included in this study. Regarding patterns of metastases, disease-free, and overall-survival, 259 patients with SLNB were compared retrospectively to 218 patients without SLNB. The detection of micrometastasis in SLN proved to be a significant prognostic factor in H&N patients [hazard ratio (HR) 3.69, p < 0.0001]. A significant improvement of recurrence-free survival (RFS, p = 0.011), regional lymph node metastasis-free survival (LFS, p = 0.007), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMSF, p = 0.015) was observed for patients with SLNB versus non-SLNB. Furthermore, a trend towards better overall survival (OS) was found (p = 0.053) for the SLNB group. SLNB improved prognostic outcome in H&N melanoma in terms of disease-free and distant metastases survival, reduced subsequent regional lymph node metastases, and showed a trend towards a better OS.
Medical subject headings
- Facial Neoplasms
- Lymph Nodes
- Melanoma
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Scalp
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
- Skin Neoplasms