Clinical Performance of the ASR and ReCap Resurfacing Implants—7 Years Follow-Up.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25720854.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.029.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We perform a non-randomized, consecutive pilot study on the ASR and ReCap resurfacing hip implants and have completed 7 years follow-up. Forty-six non-osteoporotic patients with hip osteoarthritis and anatomical conditions suitable for resurfacing were divided into 2 equal groups and operated sequentially, starting with the ASR implants. Sixteen patients operated with ASR and 19 patients with ReCap have been followed-up. There were no significant differences between the two groups preoperatively as to physical function, pain, or femoral BMD. The serum concentrations of cobalt and chromium were higher in the ASR group from 1/2 to 7 years postoperatively. Five of 16 ASR implants have been revised, and none of the ReCap implants. BMD below the femoral component increased in both groups.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Prosthesis
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
Anatomy
- hip
- femur