Insights into inpatients with poor vision: A high value proposition.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25755206.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/jhm.2342 and PMC identifier 4412795.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vision impairment is an under-recognized risk factor for adverse events among hospitalized patients, yet vision is neither routinely tested nor documented for inpatients. Low-cost ($8 and up) nonprescription "readers" may be a simple, high-value intervention to improve inpatients' vision. We aimed to study initial feasibility and efficacy of screening and correcting inpatients' vision. METHODS: From June 2012 through January 2014 we began testing whether participants' vision corrected with nonprescription lenses for eligible participants failing a vision screen (Snellen chart) performed by research assistants (RAs). Descriptive statistics and tests of comparison, including t tests and χ(2) tests, were used when appropriate. All analyses were performed using Stata version 12 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). RESULTS: Over 800 participants' vision was screened (n = 853). Older (≥65 years; 56%) participants were more likely to have insufficient vision than younger (<65 years; 28%; P < 0.001). Nonprescription readers corrected the majority of eligible participants' vision (82%, 95/116). DISCUSSION: Among an easily identified subgroup of inpatients with poor vision, low-cost readers successfully corrected most participants' vision. Hospitalists and other clinicians working in the inpatient setting can play an important role in identifying opportunities to provide high-value care related to patients' vision.
Medical subject headings
- Eyeglasses
- Inpatients
- Mass Screening
- Vision, Low