Comparing the long-term results of two uncemented femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25773575.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.024.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
327 proximal and 185 extensively coated femoral stems with mean 10-year follow-up were reviewed. Implant survivorship, clinical outcomes, and radiographic analyses were compared. Kaplan-Meier implant survivorship was 97.5% for the proximal, and 98.8% for the extensively coated stem for stem-only revisions at 10-years. The proximally coated stem outperformed on the PCS arm of the SF-12 (P = 0.04) and stiffness arm of the WOMAC (P = 0.03). Otherwise, all clinical outcomes were comparable. Thigh pain incidence was 12.5% and 5.3% for the extensive versus proximally coated groups, respectively (P = 0.007). Radiographic review identified more severe stress shielding (P < 0.001) in the extensively coated stems. This study supports the long-term clinical track record of total hip arthroplasty using two different cementless stem designs.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Femur
- Hip Prosthesis
- Prosthesis Design
- Prosthesis Failure
- Reoperation
Anatomy
- femur
- hip