The Cost-Utility of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Earlier Intervention, Improved Economics.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25865813.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.028.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We estimated the cost of Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years gained according to preoperative disease severity. We studied 159 primary unilateral THA, mean follow-up: 4 years. A median split of preoperative WOMAC scores was done to set apart a low (better) and a high (worse) score group. The groups with worse preoperative WOMAC were consistently associated with a less cost-effective intervention. The highest mean cost-effectiveness was achieved by patients with better WOMAC-total ($8256.32/QALY-gained). As patients aged, the cost-effectiveness of THA decreased. Patients 75 years of age or older and with worse scores had the least cost-effective interventions ($25,937.33/QALY-gained). THA remains a very cost-effective intervention even when performed in older "sicker" patients. Waiting for the patient to deteriorate will make the intervention more "expensive".
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Joint Diseases
- Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Anatomy
- hip