Provent therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: Impact of nasal obstruction.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25891298.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/lary.25312.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Determine the impact of nasal obstruction on efficacy, success, and adherence of Provent therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Prospective, two-arm, clinical pilot study at a single clinical site. Patients with OSA who failed continuous positive airway pressure therapy were divided into two treatment arms: arm 1 were patients with no complaints of nasal obstruction and <50% nasal obstruction on exam, and arm 2 were patients with occasional complaints of nasal obstruction and 50% to 80% nasal obstruction on exam. Sleep testing at home was performed prior to the trial and on day 10 of the study with the use of Provent. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) decreased significantly from 20.5 ± 14.8 to 11.5 ± 16.6 (P < .001) in our total patient population. Patients in arm 1 had statistically significant improvement in their AHI (18.1 ± 13.0 to 7.4 ± 10.1, P < .001), oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (16.3 ± 10.8 to 8.2 ± 9.0, P < .001), and minimum oxygen saturation (81.3% ± 6.7% to 86.9% ± 5.6%, P = 0.008) from baseline sleep study to sleep study 2. Patients in arm 2 had improvements in their AHI (23.4 ± 16.6 to 16.5 ± 21.4), ODI (21.5 ± 14.8 to 17.0 ± 16.0) and minimum 02 %. However, none of these reached statistical significance. In this study, Provent therapy had a high failure rate. Patients without nasal obstruction showed greater improvements using Provent than patients with obstruction. Correction of nasal obstruction may be a useful prerequisite for treatment with Provent.
Medical subject headings
- Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
- Nasal Obstruction
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive