Influence of less than full-time or full-time on totality of training and subsequent consultant appointment in anaesthesia.

Abstract

Changes in medical training have increased the popularity of less than full-time training. However, there are no data on the impact on training time or consultant workforce. We reviewed a three-year cohort of trainees via the Royal College of Anaesthetist's training and recruitment databases. Eighty-eight (96%) less than full-time trainees and 677 (95%) full-time trainees were appointed to a substantive consultant post (p = 0.82). Three (3%) less than full-time trainees and 12 (2%) full-time trainees gained part-time consultant posts (p < 0.001). Average length of training (years, months, days) was 8 y, 5 m, 6 d (median (IQR [range]) 5 y, 0 m, 14 d (4 y, 11 m, 29 d - 9 y, 8 m, 3 d [4 y, 2 m, 18 d - 12 y, 0 m, 0 d]) for full-time and 10 y, 8 m, 23 d (median (IQR [range]) 7 y, 3 m, 28 d (6 y, 7 m, 24 d - 11 y, 1 m, 23 d [4 y, 11 m, 29 d - 11 y, 9 m, 10 d]) for less than full-time trainees. The average length of training for both groups is significantly longer than the seven years used in workforce planning.