The Role of All-Polyethylene Tibial Components in Modern TKA.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26086937.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1551832.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In the modern era of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a majority of orthopedic surgeons utilize metal-backed tibial (MBT) components rather than nonmodular designs, such as all-polyethylene tibial (APT) components. Interestingly, current clinical evidence does not explain this disproportionate practice by surgeons. The shift in surgeon preference from APT to MBT components occurred in the 1980s following unfavorable results from early studies with APT. However, results from current studies that have revisited the APT versus MBT component comparison demonstrate similar implant survivorship and patient outcomes. Despite equivalent survivorship and improved cost-efficiency, APT components have not achieved equivalent utilization rates with MBT. This review of the current literature, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of APT components, will outline a rationale for the role of APT components in today's cost-driven, outcomes-oriented, patient-centered health-care system.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Knee Prosthesis
- Polyethylene
- Prosthesis Design
Anatomy
- knee
- tibia