Measuring Comprehensiveness of Primary Care: Challenges and Opportunities.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26105670.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11606-015-3300-z and PMC identifier 4512967.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Comprehensiveness of primary care (the extent to which the clinician, as part of the primary care team, recognizes and meets the majority of each patient's physical and mental health care needs) is an important element of primary care, but seems to be declining in the U.S. This is concerning, because more comprehensive primary care is associated with greater equity and efficiency in health care, improved continuity, less care fragmentation and better health outcomes. Without measurement and support for its improvement, comprehensiveness may further decline as other measured aspects of primary care (e.g. access, coordination) improve. To track, support and improve comprehensiveness, it is useful to have valid and reliable ways to measure it. This paper discusses challenges to measuring comprehensiveness for a primary care team's patient panel, presents survey and claims-based measures of comprehensiveness, and provides suggestions for future research.
Medical subject headings
- Delivery of Health Care
- Primary Health Care
- Quality of Health Care