Perceived effectiveness of HPV test as a primary screening modality among US providers.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26116889.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.06.007 and PMC identifier 4547872.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The human papillomavirus (HPV) test, administered alone without the Papanicolaou (Pap) test, was recently recognized as a cervical cancer screening option in the United States by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the Food and Drug Administration has approved an HPV test for primary screening. METHODS: Surveys of US internists, family practitioners, nurse practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists were conducted in 2009 and 2012 to investigate providers' perceptions of the effectiveness of the HPV test administered alone as a population-based screening modality (2009: N=1040, 141-494 per provider group; 2012: N=1039, 155-435 per provider group). RESULTS: The majority in each provider group agreed that the HPV test administered alone is an effective screening modality in 2009 (75.3%-86.1%) and 2012 (79.5%-91.8%), and agreement rose significantly during this time period among family practitioners (χ(2)=15.26, df=1, p<0.001) and nurse practitioners (χ(2)=4.53, df=1, p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Agreement that the HPV test administered alone is an effective cervical cancer screening modality was widespread among providers in both 2009 and 2012, however implementation of guidelines for screening with the HPV test may be influenced by many other factors including reimbursement and patient preferences.
Medical subject headings
- Attitude of Health Personnel
- Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests
- Papillomavirus Infections
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'