Measuring the precise area of peripheral retinal non-perfusion using ultra-widefield imaging and its correlation with the ischaemic index.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26135013.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306652.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine the calculated, anatomically correct, area of retinal non-perfusion and total area of visible retina on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWF FA) in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and to compare the corrected measures of non-perfusion with the ischaemic index. Uncorrected UWF FA images from 32 patients with RVO were graded manually for capillary non-perfusion, which was calculated as a percentage of the total visible retina (uncorrected ischaemic index). The annotated images were converted using novel stereographic projection software to calculate precise areas of non-perfusion in mm(2), which was compared as a percentage of the total area of visible retina ('corrected non-perfusion percentage') with the ischaemic index. The precise areas of peripheral non-perfusion ranged from 0 mm(2) to 365.4 mm(2) (mean 95.1 mm(2)), while the mean total visible retinal area was 697.0 mm(2). The mean corrected non-perfusion percentage was similar to the uncorrected ischaemic index (13.5% vs 14.8%, p=0.239). The corrected non-perfusion percentage correlated with uncorrected ischaemic index (R=0.978, p<0.001), but the difference in non-perfusion percentage between corrected and uncorrected metrics was as high as 14.8%. Using stereographic projection software, lesion areas on UWF images can be calculated in anatomically correct physical units (mm(2)). Eyes with RVO show large areas of peripheral retinal non-perfusion.
Medical subject headings
- Fluorescein Angiography
- Ischemia
- Retinal Vein Occlusion
- Retinal Vessels