Quality of Life and General Health After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Pathologies: Determining a Valid and Responsive Metric of Health State Utility.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26191977.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000886.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
As part of the Affordable Care Act, health utility metrics are being investigated to define a cost-effective, value-based health care model. EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6D (SF-6D) are commonly used quality-of-life instruments. Domains in the EQ-5D questionnaire are thought to be less responsive in measuring quality of life after cervical surgery. To evaluate the validity and responsiveness of SF-6D and EQ-5D in determining health and quality of life after elective cervical spine surgery. A total of 420 patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery over a period of 2 years were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal registry. Patient-reported outcomes Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D, and SF-12 were recorded. Based on previously published equations, SF-6D was calculated using NDI and SF-12 scores. Patients were asked whether "surgery met their expectations" (meaningful improvement). The validity and relative responsiveness of SF-6D (NDI), SF-6D (SF-12), and EQ-5D to discriminate between meaningful and nonmeaningful improvement were calculated. Sixty-six percent of patients (277) reported a level of improvement after surgery that met their expectations (meaningful improvement). SF-6D (NDI) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.69) was a more valid discriminator of meaningful improvement compared with the SF-6D (SF-12) (AUC = 0.65) and EQ-5D (AUC = 0.62). SF-6D (NDI) was also a more responsive measure compared with SF-6D (SF-12) and EQ-5D (standardized response mean difference: 0.66, 0.48, and 0.44, respectively). SF-6D is a more valid and responsive measure of general health and quality of life compared with EQ-5D. SF-6D derived from disease-specific disability scores was more valid and responsive than that derived from the generic preference-based SF-12. Cost-effective studies should use SF-6D as a measure of QALY after cervical spine surgery.
Medical subject headings
- Cervical Vertebrae
- Elective Surgical Procedures
- Health Status
- Quality of Life
- Surveys and Questionnaires