The Surgical Care Improvement Project Antibiotic Guidelines: Should We Expect More Than Good Intentions?
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26197373.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000735 and PMC identifier 4510848.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Since 2006, the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) has promoted 3 perioperative antibiotic recommendations designed to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections. Despite good evidence for the efficacy of these recommendations, the efforts of SCIP have not measurably improved the rates of surgical site infections. We offer 3 arguments as to why SCIP has fallen short of expectations. We then suggest a reorientation of quality improvement efforts to focus less on reporting, and incentivizing adherence to imperfect metrics, and more on creating local and regional quality collaboratives to educate clinicians about how to improve practice. Ultimately, successful quality improvement projects are behavioral interventions that will only succeed to the degree that they motivate individual clinicians, practicing within a particular context, to do the difficult work of identifying failures and iteratively working toward excellence.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Perioperative Care
- Quality Improvement
- Quality Indicators, Health Care
- Surgical Wound Infection