Second-Trimester Cervical Length Screening Among Asymptomatic Women: An Evaluation of Risk-Based Strategies.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26241257.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000864.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To estimate whether there are demographic or clinical characteristics that are associated with the likelihood of having a short cervix and whether these characteristics can be used to optimize cervical length screening. This is a cohort study of women with a singleton gestation without a history of spontaneous preterm birth who underwent routine transvaginal second-trimester cervical length screening. Seven risk factors for preterm birth were compared by cervical length status. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for a short cervix (cervical length 2.5 cm or less). Different prediction models for a short cervix, based on the number of risk factors present, were developed and test characteristics for cervical length assessment for different risk-based screening approaches were calculated. Of the 18,250 women screened, 164 (0.9%) had a short cervix. Maternal age and conception by in vitro fertilization were not significantly associated with a short cervix. However, black (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.42-5.87) and Hispanic (adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.10-2.74) race-ethnicity, current tobacco use (adjusted OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.56-8.62), prior indicated preterm birth (adjusted OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.26-4.05), and having a prior cervical excisional procedure (adjusted OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.86-4.70) were independent risk factors for a short cervix. If only women with any of these variables present were offered transvaginal cervical length screening, the specificity increases from 62.8% for universal screening to 96.5% with a risk-based approach. The sensitivity with one variable present to offer transvaginal scanning was 62.8% and with two factors 14%. Limiting cervical length screening to women with at least one of the identified risk factors for a short cervix substantially decreases the number of ultrasonograms for cervical length assessment. However, this strategy results in nearly 40% of women with a short cervix not being ascertained. II.
Medical subject headings
- Cervical Length Measurement
- Decision Support Techniques
- Pregnancy Trimester, Second
- Premature Birth