Why such differing stances? A review of position statements on home birth from professional colleges.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26337262.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.13594.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Despite low rates of home birth throughout most Western countries, the topic generates considerable debate. This is reflected by the differing positions on home birth adopted by professional colleges representing obstetricians and midwives. We reviewed position statements of midwifery and obstetric colleges in the UK, USA, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada to explore how the same body of research evidence leads to different positions. Aside from a joint statement from the UK we found widely differing stances, reflecting traditional midwifery perspectives of birth as a physiological process versus obstetric perspectives of potential pathology. We feel the differences in position statements are largely the end product of significant confirmatory bias. Review of organisational position on home birth suggests bias in literature interpretation.
Medical subject headings
- Attitude of Health Personnel
- Home Childbirth
- Midwifery
- Obstetrics