Conventional Versus Cross-Linked Polyethylene for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26375527.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3928/01477447-20150902-05.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 88 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with either conventional polyethylene or cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) from the same manufacturer were compared. There were no significant differences between the 2 subpopulations regarding average age, gender, side affected, or prosthetic stem and cup size. The average follow-up was 104 months (range, 55 to 131 months). To the authors' knowledge, this is the longest follow-up for this particular insert. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually. Results showed that XLPE has a significantly greater wear reduction than that of standard polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. At the longest available follow-up for these specific inserts, XLPE proved to be effective in reducing wear.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Prosthesis
- Polyethylene
Anatomy
- hip
- femur