In-Hospital Cost Analysis of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Matter?
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26387922.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.034.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to determine the impact of surgical approach on costs of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from a hospital perspective and to provide an updated cost estimation of THA. A prospective, microcosting analysis was performed on 118 patients undergoing a THA through an anterior, lateral, or posterior approach. We determined that overall costs (intraoperative costs and hospital stay) were significantly less for the anterior ($7300.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7064.49-7535.95) vs lateral ($7853.10; 95% CI, 7577.29-8128.91; P = .031) and anterior vs posterior approach ($8287.46; 95% CI, 7906.42-8668.51; P < .001). A reduction in hospital length of stay when THA was performed through an anterior approach contributed significantly to an overall reduction in costs from a hospital perspective.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hospital Costs
- Length of Stay
Anatomy
- hip