Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: the PRIME consortium methodology.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26447175.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.153858 and PMC identifier 4698558.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Few studies have evaluated the implementation and impact of real-world mental health programmes delivered at scale in low-resource settings. To describe the cross-country research methods used to evaluate district-level mental healthcare plans (MHCPs) in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa and Uganda. Multidisciplinary methods conducted at community, health facility and district levels, embedded within a theory of change. The following designs are employed to evaluate the MHCPs: (a) repeat community-based cross-sectional surveys to measure change in population-level contact coverage; (b) repeat facility-based surveys to assess change in detection of disorders; (c) disorder-specific cohorts to assess the effect on patient outcomes; and (d) multilevel case studies to evaluate the process of implementation. To evaluate whether and how a health-system-level intervention is effective, multidisciplinary research methods are required at different population levels. Although challenging, such methods may be replicated across diverse settings.
Medical subject headings
- Community Mental Health Services
- Mental Disorders
- Patient Care Planning
- Program Evaluation