A Comparison of Photocurrent Mechanisms in Quasi-Metallic and Semiconducting Carbon Nanotube pn-Junctions.

Chang, Shun-Wen; Hazra, Jubin; Amer, Moh; Kapadia, Rehan; Cronin, Stephen B · ACS Nano · 2015

basic_science · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

We present a comparative study of quasi-metallic (Eg ∼ 100 meV) and semiconducting (Eg ∼ 1 eV) suspended carbon nanotube pn-junctions introduced by electrostatic gating. While the built-in fields of the quasi-metallic carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are 1-2 orders of magnitude smaller than those of the semiconducting CNTs, their photocurrent is 2 orders of magnitude higher than the corresponding semiconducting CNT devices under the same experimental conditions. Here, the large exciton binding energy in semiconducting nanotubes (∼400 meV) makes it difficult for excitons to dissociate into free carriers that can contribute to an externally measured photocurent. As such, semiconducting nanotubes require a phonon to assist in the exciton dissociation process, in order to produce a finite photocurrent, while quasi-metallic nanotubes do not. The quasi-metallic nanotubes have much lower exciton binding energies (∼50 meV) as well as a continuum of electronic states to decay into and, therefore, do not require the absorption of a phonon in order to dissociate, making it much easier for these excitons to produce a photocurrent. We performed detailed simulations of the band energies in quasi-metallic and semiconducting nanotube devices in order to obtain the electric field profiles along the lengths of the nanotubes. These simulations predict maximum built-in electric field strengths of 2.3 V/μm for semiconducting and 0.032-0.22 V/μm for quasi-metallic nanotubes under the applied gate voltages used in this study.