Chest pain for coronary heart disease in general practice: clinical judgement and a clinical decision rule.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Marburg Heart Score (MHS) is a simple, valid, and robust clinical decision rule assisting GPs in ruling out coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients presenting with chest pain. AIM: To investigate whether using the rule adds to the GP's clinical judgement. DESIGN AND SETTING: A comparative diagnostic accuracy study was conducted using data from 832 consecutive patients with chest pain in general practice. METHOD: Three diagnostic strategies were defined using the MHS: diagnosis based solely on the MHS; using the MHS as a triage test; and GP's clinical judgement aided by the MHS. Their accuracy was compared with the GPs' unaided clinical judgement. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the GPs' unaided clinical judgement was 82.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 72.4 to 89.9) and 61.0% (95% CI = 56.7 to 65.2), respectively. In comparison, the sensitivity of the MHS was higher (difference 8.5%, 95% CI = -2.4 to 19.6) and the specificity was similar (difference -0.4%, 95% CI = -5.3 to 4.5); the sensitivity of the triage was similar (difference -1.5%, 95% CI = -9.8 to 7.0) and the specificity was higher (difference 11.6%, 95% CI = 7.8 to 15.4); and both the sensitivity and specificity of the aided clinical judgement were higher (difference 8.0%, 95% CI = -6.9 to 23.0 and 5.8%, 95% CI = -1.6 to 13.2, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using the Marburg Heart Score for initial triage can improve the clinical diagnosis of CHD in general practice.