The Importance of Risk Adjustment in Reporting Total Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26525486.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.041.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study describes and tests a risk adjustment model developed for the California Joint Replacement Registry to report predictors of complication rates. Complication rates were analyzed for 9960 patients enrolled in the California Joint Replacement Registry at 22 medical centers. Multivariable logistic risk models were created to analyze risks of postoperative complications. Age and American Society of Anesthesiologists class were the strongest predictors of complication rates (P < .0001). Congestive heart failure and peripheral vascular disease were also statistically significant predictors of complications. Three hospitals were found to have statistically significantly worse than expected complication rates, and one was found to have a better than expected complication rate after case mix risk adjustment. Adequate risk adjustment is a key element in objective comparison of surgeons, hospitals, and devices using total joint arthroplasty registry data.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Postoperative Complications
- Risk Adjustment
Anatomy
- hip
- knee