Is There an Economic Case for Training Intervention in the Manual Material Handling Sector of Developing Countries?
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26565709.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000603.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To estimate cost-effectiveness ratios and net costs of a training intervention to reduce morbidity among porters who carry loads without mechanical assistance in a developing country informal sector setting. Pre- and post-intervention survey data (n = 100) were collected in a prospective study: differences in physical/mental composite scores and pain scale scores were computed. Costs and economic benefits of the intervention were monetized with a net-cost model. Significant changes in physical composite scores (2.5), mental composite scores (3.2), and pain scale scores (-1.0) led to cost-effectiveness ratios of $6.97, $5.41, and $17.91, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that program adherence enhanced effectiveness. The net cost of the intervention was -$5979.00 due to a reduction in absenteeism. Workplace ergonomic training is cost-effective and should be implemented wherein other engineering-control interventions are precluded due to infrastructural constraints.
Medical subject headings
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Ergonomics
- Lifting
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Occupational Diseases
- Occupational Health Services
- Occupational Injuries