A randomised comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation for infraclavicular catheter placement.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26566960.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/anae.13302.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We conducted this study to determine if placement of infraclavicular catheters guided by ultrasound is quicker than placement guided by nerve stimulation. Infraclavicular brachial plexus catheters were inserted in 210 randomly allocated patients who were scheduled for elective hand or elbow surgery. Needle and catheter placement was guided by ultrasound (n = 105) or by nerve stimulation (n = 105). The primary outcome was time to sensory block success. Success rate was similar between the two techniques (83.2% vs 81.4%, p = 0.738). However, placement of ultrasound-guided catheters took less time (7.2 [2.5] vs 9.6 [3.6] min, p < 0 .001). Pain and satisfaction scores, and incidence of nerve deficit, were also similar with both techniques.
Medical subject headings
- Anesthetics, Local
- Brachial Plexus Block
- Electric Stimulation
- Pain
- Ultrasonography, Interventional