Computed tomography morphological analysis of the scapula and its implications in shoulder arthroplasty.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26577505.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00590-015-1721-3.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Healthy shoulder morphology is still unclear. Since bone morphology influences prosthetic features, this is relevant for glenohumeral joint reconstruction. The objective of this study was to assess the normal values of glenoid version, maximum width, base width and vault depth on computed tomography scans. Axial cut CT scans of 1072 healthy glenoids were retrospectively reviewed. Values of glenoid version, maximum glenoid width, glenoid base width and glenoid vault depth were measured by two different observers. Differences were determined between genders, and reproducibility and interrater reliability assessed. Glenoid version was 37.71° ± 10.75°, range -6.20° to 71.30°; maximum glenoid width was 26.06 ± 3.27 mm, range 15.40-36.90 mm; glenoid base width was 16.59 ± 2.61 mm, range 8.90-25.40 mm; glenoid vault depth was 9.72 ± 1.62 mm, range 4.70-15.90 mm. All measurements except for glenoid version were significantly higher in males than in females. Reproducibility was good for every measurement, except glenoid vault depth. We found differences in maximum glenoid width, base width and vault depth by gender in a large sample. Glenoid components' maximum width was defined, as was reaming extension and orientation, the space available for implantation of the glenoid component, placement of pegs or keels in anatomic prostheses and the target for glenoid screws in inverted prostheses. II.
Medical subject headings
- Scapula
- Shoulder Joint
Anatomy
- scapula
- shoulder