MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Multiphase Level-Set Method.
other
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26697962.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.115.163550.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Inaccuracy in MR image-based attenuation correction (MR-AC) leads to errors in quantification and the misinterpretation of lesions in brain PET/MRI studies. To resolve this problem, we proposed an improved ultrashort echo time MR-AC method that was based on a multiphase level-set algorithm with main magnetic field (B0) inhomogeneity correction. We also assessed the feasibility of this level-set-based MR-AC method (MR-AC(level)), compared with CT-AC and MR-AC provided by the manufacturer of the PET/MRI scanner (MR-AC(mMR)). Ten healthy volunteers and 20 Parkinson disease patients underwent(18)F-FDG and(18)F-fluorinated-N-3-fluoropropyl-2-β-carboxymethoxy-3-β-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane ((18)F-FP-CIT) PET scans, respectively, using both PET/MRI and PET/CT scanners. The level-set-based segmentation algorithm automatically delimited air, bone, and soft tissue from the ultrashort echo time MR images. For the comparison, MR-AC maps were coregistered to reference CT. PET sinogram data obtained from PET/CT studies were then reconstructed using the CT-AC, MR-AC(mMR), and MR-AC(level) maps. The accuracies of SUV, SUVr (SUV and its ratio to the cerebellum), and specific-to-nonspecific binding ratios obtained using MR-AC(level) and MR-AC(mMR) were compared with CT-AC using region-of-interest- and voxel-based analyses. There was remarkable improvement in the segmentation of air cavities and bones and the quantitative accuracy of PET measurement using the level set. Although the striatal and cerebellar activities in (18)F-FP-CIT PET and frontal activity in (18)F-FDG PET were significantly underestimated by the MR-AC(mMR), the MR-AC(level) provided PET images almost equivalent to the CT-AC images. PET quantification error was reduced by a factor of 3 using MR-AC(level) (SUV error < 10% in MR-AC(level) and < 30% in MR-AC(mMR) [version VB18P], and < 5% in MR-AC(level) and < 15% in MR-AC(mMR) [VB20P]). The results of this study indicate that our new multiphase level-set-based MR-AC method improves the quantitative accuracy of brain PET in PET/MRI studies.
Medical subject headings
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Positron-Emission Tomography