Arthroscopy Journal Prizes Are Major Decisions.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26743401.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.009.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
According to the Harvard Business Review, the optimal number of people in a decision-making group is no more than 8. Thus, it is no surprise that 18 Arthroscopy journal associate editors had difficulty making a major decision. In the end, 18 editors did successfully select the 2015 winner of the Best Comparative Study Prize. All studies have limitations, but from a statistical standpoint, the editors believe that the conclusions of the winning study are likely correct.
Medical subject headings
- Awards and Prizes
- Decision Making
- Periodicals as Topic
- Publishing