Comparing Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Radio Frequency Ablation Assisted Tumor Enucleation and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1a Renal Tumor: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26905020.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.115.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluated the functional outcome, safety and efficacy of zero ischemia laparoscopic radio frequency ablation assisted tumor enucleation compared with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted from April 2013 to March 2015 in patients with cT1a renal tumor scheduled for laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery. All patients were followed for at least 12 months. Patients in the laparoscopic radio frequency ablation assisted tumor enucleation group underwent tumor enucleation after radio frequency ablation without hilar clamping. The primary outcome was the change in glomerular filtration rate of the affected kidney by renal scintigraphy at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate, estimated blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes. The Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact, Student t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used. RESULTS: The trial ultimately enrolled 89 patients, of whom 44 were randomized to the laparoscopic radio frequency ablation assisted tumor enucleation group and 45 to the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group. In the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group 1 case was converted to radical nephrectomy. Compared with the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group, patients in the laparoscopic radio frequency ablation assisted tumor enucleation group had a smaller decrease in glomerular filtration rate of the affected kidney at 3 months (10.2% vs 20.5%, p=0.001) and 12 months (7.6% vs 16.2%, p=0.002). Patients in the laparoscopic radio frequency ablation assisted tumor enucleation group had a shorter operative time (p=0.002), lower estimated blood loss (p <0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (p=0.029) but similar postoperative complications (p=1.000). There were no positive margins or local recurrence in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Zero ischemia laparoscopic radio frequency ablation assisted tumor enucleation enables tumor excision with better renal function preservation compared to conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Less blood loss and a shorter operative time were achieved with similar postoperative complication rates.