Editorial Commentary: Proximal Stabilization for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation--Respect the Anatomy and Achieve Excellent Outcomes Regardless of Specific Technique.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26945958.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.037.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In a Level IV evidence systematic review of 13 studies comparing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and medial soft-tissue realignment for recurrent lateral patellar instability without osseous pathology, both techniques showed excellent outcomes with low recurrent dislocation rates (<10% for both) without significant clinical, radiographic, or instability differences between the two groups at minimum 2-year follow-up. As in all well-designed and -conducted systematic reviews, the authors delicately balance study homogeneity (similar patients and surgical procedures-excluding distal osseous realignment and first-time dislocators) and heterogeneity (improved generalizability: dichotomized medial soft-tissue realignment and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction).
Medical subject headings
- Joint Instability
- Patellar Dislocation
Anatomy
- knee