The Role of Social Networks, Medical-Legal Climate, and Patient Advocacy on Surgical Options: A New Era.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 26959205.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001335.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The dissemination of information online and resultant public discourse through social media and other online channels has influenced the practice of medicine in dramatic ways. Physicians have historically worked to develop new techniques and devices for the benefit of their patients. It is only a more recent phenomenon, however, that these tools are either removed or their use is curtailed largely driven by anecdotal reports; passionate, vocal, often media-savvy advocates; and plaintiff attorneys. The use of power morcellation, hysteroscopic tubal sterilization, and mesh in urogynecologic procedures all have been victims of these societal pressures. It is important for health care professionals to be involved in the debate to ensure that public outcry does not unduly influence what we, as clinicians, are able to safely offer our patients. By being better advocates for our field, our instruments, and our patients, we can ensure medical decision-making is driven by good science and not public fervor.
Medical subject headings
- Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
- Patient Advocacy
- Social Media
- Social Networking