Aortic valve replacement with a 17-mm mechanical prosthesis in octogenarian or older patients.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27016790.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.037.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Few studies have reported on aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients aged >80 years who have small aortic annuli. Various surgical techniques have been proposed for treating such patients. We investigated AVR using small-diameter mechanical valves, in patients aged >80 years, to determine its effectiveness. Eighteen consecutive patients (15 women; 3 men) aged >80 (mean: 83.3 ± 2.7) years underwent surgical AVR with a 17-mm prosthesis. The clinical status and results of pre- and post-operative echocardiography were evaluated. Midterm examination was conducted at 12.0 ± 1.0 months after AVR. The average preoperative body surface area of the patients was 1.39 ± 0.15 m(2); the average New York Heart Association functional class was 3.28 ± 0.75. Echocardiography showed a peak pressure gradient of 99.1 ± 38.4 mm Hg. Operative mortality was absent. A significant decrease in the peak pressure gradient was found on early (22.6 ± 7.2 mm Hg) and midterm (22.2 ± 8.0 mm Hg) postoperative echocardiography, compared with that in the preoperative period. During this follow-up, 16 patients improved to class I, a significant change in each perioperative period compared with the preoperative period. No mortality was observed at 1 year postoperatively. In patients aged >80 years who have small aortic annuli, AVR using a 17-mm prosthesis showed satisfactory clinical and hemodynamic results and provided a satisfactory remote prognosis.
Medical subject headings
- Aortic Valve
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Heart Valve Prosthesis
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement