Low-Contact-Stress Knee Arthroplasty: Past History or Ahead of Time?
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27135454.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3928/01477447-20160427-16.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Low-contact-stress mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can rely on a long history. Its concept comprises a combination of high condylar congruency and compensatory bearing rotation to promote load sharing. However, other MB designs have become available, and critical points have been raised about the benefit of MB in general. Although there is kinematic and kinetic support for the low-contact-stress concept, there is no tribologic or clinical proof of its superiority over fixed-bearing concepts. Further study should be controlled for differences in polyethylene quality and need to provide a measure of condylar congruency to differentiate authentic low-contact-stress variants form others. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):e402-e412.].
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Knee Prosthesis
- Prosthesis Design
Anatomy
- knee