Midterm Results After Coated and Uncoated TKA: A Randomized Controlled Study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27219721.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3928/01477447-20160509-10.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who have hypersensitivity to metals usually receive hypoallergenic TKA implants. Coating of a standard implant is a common solution. Although in vitro tests have demonstrated reduction in polyethylene wear for these coatings, it is unknown whether these costly implants have a clinical benefit for patients. One hundred twenty patients undergoing TKA were randomly assigned to receive a novel 7-layer-coating implant or a standard TKA implant. One revision occurred in the standard group, resulting in a calculated 5-year survival of 100% in the coated group and 98.1% in the standard group. The Oxford Knee Score improved substantially in both groups from a mean of 21.6 points preoperatively in the coated group and 21.9 points in the standard group to 39.2 points and 39.2 points, respectively. The current authors observed no adverse effects with the new coating during midterm follow-up. However, longer follow-up time is needed to evaluate possible advantages of this coating. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):S13-S17.].
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Knee Prosthesis
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
Anatomy
- knee